- Jul
- 31
- 2007
- 9:51 AM
Luxury ETF; hola, FINRA; and debunking some mythinformation
- By: Ray Pellecchia
- File Under: ETFs / Indexes, NYSE
New Claymore/Robb Report Global Luxury Index ETF lists on NYSE Group -- NYSE Euronext today announced that the Claymore/Robb Report Global Luxury Index ETF listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol ROB. This ETF seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund’s fees and expenses, of the Robb Report Global Luxury Index, which is comprised of companies with a core offering of luxury goods and services. (NYSE.com)
NASD, NYSE Member Regulation Combine to Form FINRA -- The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) today announced that it has commenced operations as the largest non-governmental regulatory organization for securities brokers and dealers doing business in the United States. FINRA was created through the consolidation of NASD and the member regulation, enforcement and arbitration operations of the New York Stock Exchange. The consolidation, which was announced on Nov. 28, 2006 and approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2007, became effective today, July 30, 2007. (FINRA.org)
Some good friends and colleagues are going from NYSE Regulation to FINRA in this move. As someone on the business side, I would never tell a regulator to "knock 'em dead," so I'll just say good luck, my friends.
Cramer: Friday's Sell-Off Is Suspect! (TheStreet.com) -- In this video interview, James Cramer suggests that the Dow Jones' problem with calculating the Dow Jones Industrial Average might have been caused by our Hybrid Market. That's not the case, as Dow Jones itself said here. Cramer said, "I want to understand whether the Hybrid system can handle the volume." It can, and it did. Amid record traffic for the day last Thursday, and for the week in total, our system held up fine.
Dinosaur Trader wrote meyesterday and today about Cramer's comments. I couldn't find on CNBC.com the comments he asked about, but I did see the above similar-sounding piece on TheStreet.com.
And last but not least, the requisite bit of trivia for your Tuesday edification:Today in NYSE History: 31 July 1914 -- The NYSE was closed until 28 November due to the outbreak of World War I. (NYSE.com)
Our history book says of this event: "The outbreak of World War I ushered in one of the greatest crisis periods for the NYSE and the nation. As the war erupted in July 1914, eschanges throughout Europe and the Americas rushed to close their doors. Montreal, Toronto and Madrid closed on July 28; Vienna, Budapest, Brussels, Antwerp, Berlin and Rome on July 29; St. Petersburg and all the South American exchanges on July 30; and London on the morning of July 31. in the words of then-NYSE President H.G.S. Noble, this left New York as 'the only market in the world in which a panic could vent itself.'
"When news of the London closing reached New York, the NYSE Governing Committee met on the morning of July 31 to consider what action to take. After consulting with leading bankers and stockbrokers, just minutes before the scheduled 10 a.m. opening, the committee voted to close the Exchange until further notice. The NYSE remained closed for 4 1/2 months, finally reopening on December 15, but under minimum price restrictions. When price restrictions were finally removed on April 1, 1915, volume and prices soared."
Tags: New York Stock Exchange, Hybrid Market, NYSE, NYSE Euronext, NYX, trading, stock market, ETFs, stock market history, FINRA


Comments
Ray,
Yup, that's basically the Cramer stuff I was talking about.
Did you say somewhere that the average trade size since hybrid implementation is 400 shares? If so, how can the market absorb the huge blocks of stock that would be up for sale given a real market meltdown?
-DT
by Dinosaur Trader on July 31, 2007 12:34 PM
DT -- Yes, average trade size is fewer than 400 shares, but that doesn't mean that big blocks cannot be done.
We define blocks as trades of 10,000 shares or more. Decimals and the trend toward slicing large orders into smaller ones have driven the average lower. However, the fact that smaller trades are far greater in frequency doesn't mean that big ones don't occur.
Also bear in mind that the other side of a block order frequently consists of multiple smaller orders.
Additionally, blocks can be given to floor brokers to "work," that is, to use their discretion and their order capabilities (reserve, pegging etc.) to get the order executed in a way that doesn't negatively impact the price.
The number of block trades is down from that of recent years, tthough overall trading volume is up. Still, our Facts & Figures data indicate that in June 2007 (21 trading days), NYSE Group executed 165,700 block trades, accounting for 5.6 billion shares worth $192 billion.
Hope that's of some help. As always, thanks for writing, DT.
by Ray Pellecchia on July 31, 2007 4:47 PM
Average NYSE execution size for June 2007 was 297 shares according to Bob Schwartz at the NYSE FACTS ATS Forum. Block volume makes up roughly 1/5 of both NYSE and NASDAQ volume. Thanks.
by Vlad Khandros on August 1, 2007 8:01 AM
Ray,
Thanks. Just for comparison purposes, can you give me an idea about what the average trade size was pre-hybrid?
-DT
by Dinosaur Trader on August 1, 2007 8:41 AM
DT -
Average execution size on the NYSE was around: 2,500 shares in 2000...1,000 shares in 2003...500 in 2006...and down to 297 for June 2007. Same patterns as NASDAQ but a few years later.
by Vlad Khandros on August 1, 2007 3:45 PM
Vlad,
Thanks for the info. I'd personally love to see the average execution side move back up. These chopped up orders confuse everyone but the robots.
-DT
by Dinosaur Trader on August 2, 2007 9:28 AM
Comment on this entry
Forward this entry to a friend