- Feb
- 07
- 2008
- 3:30 PM
Upcoming changes in the NYSE market model: here's the latest
- By: Ray Pellecchia
- File Under: NYSE
Thought I'd share the latest with those of you who closely follow the ongoing changes in the NYSE market model (and, may I say, bless you). I know that many of you don't have a spare hour to do things like listen to our quarterly financial-results conference calls. Which is why you have your humble blogger, because my time is either priceless, or worthless, depending on how you look at it. Anyway. So here is an excerpt from the Tuesday 5 Feb. call that I thought would be of interest:
Roger Freeman, analyst, Lehman Brothers: Okay, and Duncan, lastly, can you give me an update on discussions that you've been having with the SEC around changes of the specialist market structure and specifically, as you look at buying the AMEX here does that give you any additional ability to drive an agenda since effectively you're going to be taking care of all of the equity exchange specialist operations, modernizing them?
Duncan Niederauer, CEO, NYSE Euronext: Sure, the first part of your question, Roger, is the dialogue continues very regularly and very actively. I think we're down to where we really just have two or three rules left. One has to do with their ability to hedge and really run their business as an integrated market maker which there's a follow-up meeting on tomorrow and I think we'll be filing a rule on that front fairly soon about, then the other two changes that we're contemplating making that will be concurrent with the next phase of the technology that rolls out that Larry was referencing earlier will be tied to what I would call the elimination of the look that the specialist has had pretty much forever, in exchange for probably slightly better treatment on the parity side. I think that's where we're going to head with that.
In terms of the AMEX integration, I think that should over-simplify the landscape because it is the only other model that has what I would call close to a high-tech, high-touch model, and I think we intend to bring that over here as possible. The ETF business - I don't think we'll reinvent the wheel. I think you'll see that go to Arca. The listings business - I think you'll see us create
just a slightly different approach on the listings side to account for all the different companies. And then as far as with their model with the specialist is, many of the specialists there are also specialists here, so we imagine that if the initial conversations are any indication, they will just consolidate their businesses and do it in one place instead of two and many of the ETF specialists are also LMMs on the NYSE Arca platform so we would imagine that they would just move over as well. So I think that's all kind of to be determined but that reflects the initial conversations we've had with some of the issuers and some of the market participants over at the AMEX.
And on the technology rollout that Duncan referenced, here is that commentary from Larry Liebowitz, our executive VP in charge of U.S. Markets and Global Technology:
So turning to page four [of the slide presentation]. This is a diagram similar to what we've shown you in the past but now we're going to lay out exactly how each layer occurs and when it will probably occur. So the top line is CCG [Common Customer Gateway]. That's how our clients reach us. That's also going to be how any client in any geography reaches any of our products ultimately, and what it also does is it makes it easier for us to make the technology transitions in the layers beneath because the customers will only be affected by the top layer. As we've talked about in the U.S., we expect to roll this out in the first quarter and I'm happy to report that our specialists are already converting to the system, that should be done by this week and that we should be able to rollout to our first clients by next week so that's proceeding on path and then in Europe, we hope to be rolling this out to customers by the second half of the year, specifically in the July time frame, we'll start to roll that out. That is absolutely critical to us in terms of getting--not only getting positioned for a platform consolidation but in the U.S. that gets us off our first wave of non-stops which we'll talk about in a minute.
BTW, if you do have the time and if you're interested in NYSE Euronext as a whole, here are the full transcript and the audiocast (free registration required for the latter).
I don't have anything more definitive right now about the approvals or the timing, but obviously the next few months are going to be busy, and, I expect, productive. Will continue to keep you posted on new developments.
In the meantime...
Today in NYSE History
07 Feb 1967 -- A blizzard caused the NYSE to curtail the trading day, opening 15 minutes late and closing 90 minutes early.


Comments
So getting ETF orders to Arca this morning didn't work. Then there were a bunch of problems with regular orders last week. Ray, any comments on why Arca systems don't work as reliably as NYSE systems and what you're all doing about it?
by Sunbum on February 11, 2008 8:36 PM
Sunbum -- Will check on that and let you know what I hear.
by Ray Pellecchia on February 12, 2008 2:51 PM
Sunbum --
Just heard back from my colleague Paul Adcock, who heads our NYSE Arca platform:
"The CMS routing hardware that delivers orders from NYSE classic to NYSE
Arca primaries failed yesterday morning. Unfortunately, the recovery
process took much longer than usual and is being addressed procedurally
with the Ops teams. Trading directly with NYSE Arca was not
interrupted.
"The application that failed carries approximately 10,000 orders per day
and is used for those customers who have not redirected their routers
due to technology constraints or various other reasons. The NYSE Arca
Matching engines platform handles 250 million orders per day on average,
with a peak of 401 million orders on 1/23/08, with an average up time of
99.99% over the past year.
"Issues can and do arise with routing mechanisms and in most instances
are Network related.
"If this does not adequately address your concerns regarding the service
interruption yesterday, please do not hesitate to contact me.
"Thanks
pda"
by Ray Pellecchia on February 12, 2008 3:01 PM
What do you mean by treatment on the parity side with respect to the specialists?
What impact do you think elimination of the look will have on market conditions? thx
by curious investor on February 25, 2008 2:15 PM
Curious Investor -- We mean that we are looking to enable specialists to provide more liquidity when appropriate, and to ensure that as they do so they have no information advantage over other market participants. We hope the impact will be deeper liquidity and less volatility.
We'll be able to better define this when we file our proposal with the SEC, within the next few weeks. Will keep everyone posted on that.
Thanks for writing!
by Ray Pellecchia on February 26, 2008 10:26 PM
Arca, NASDAQ, BATS - all provide their book for free. You guys charge a ridiculous amount (#5k/mo) Why?
by Mike on March 4, 2008 12:21 PM
Mike -- My understanding from a colleague is that Nasdaq charges as much as $6,000 for a similar product, and that an Arca fee is pending. Most NYSE OpenBook subscribers pay $60 a month for the data from their firm or data vendor, which pays the larger fee.
Hope that helps. Thanks for writing!
by Ray Pellecchia on March 5, 2008 6:07 AM
Ray - Sorry but you're wrong, as is your colleague. I can tell you b/c we are a small buy side shop using a big broker. They pass the cost along. We get the full Arca, BATS, INET books for nominal fees ( less than $100) OpenBook is passed thru by GS & everyone. BUT more importantly, right now we get top of book NYSE via a prohibitively slow CQS feed. Our broker also gets NYSE top of book via the faster SFTI pipe they have but NYSE won't let them deliver that feed (mind you - exact same data) as they insist it must be bundled with OpenBook and that any unbundling would constitute a new service requiring SEC approval. (for the exact same thing!) This is coming from within NYSE. I am getting nowhere with them in discussion. Clearly this is unfavorable to the NYSE customer (us) Thoughts?
by Mike on March 5, 2008 3:29 PM
Mike -- I'm asking a colleague of mine to e-mail you back to get your phone number, so that we can address this as directly as possible.
by Ray Pellecchia on March 5, 2008 4:59 PM
Comment on this entry
Forward this entry to a friend